Is business bad for science & stop selling out science to commerce Essay - 1

Is business bad for science & stop selling out science to mercantilism - Essay ExampleThe paper seeks to show that commercial influences on scientific research have obtain increasingly detrimental.First, commercial influences on scientific research have led to failure to release most of the scientific results seen as harming industries. For example, the results whitethorn be on danger posed by certain substances or drugs produced by companies. As a result, such companies are most likely to engage in a campaign that will ensure that such results do not come to the prevalent limelight. A unadulterated example is seen through Nancy Olivieri of Toronto University (Slaght & Pallant, 2006). Olivieri notes that that one of drug companies engaged in a campaign that she did not let on her results concerning a drug she found to have a high level of toxicity (Slaght & Pallant, 2006). The allegation is in force(p) knowing that such drug will be in the public for use. Hence, this is not ju st unethical, barely also detrimental to the public as it may lead to serious short and long verge harm.Secondly, the influence of business on science has made it difficult for public to know how various advancements may be harmful to health and environment. Most of the research is done with little focus on the public concerns (Slaght & Pallant, 2006). The focus has been on ensuring their competitiveness, and business groups have been able to have their way with funding from bodies concerned with research. For example, genetic has been seen as playing a leading role in agriculture due to such influence. Hence, new(prenominal) environmental friendly approaches have been ignored such as minimal use of chemical fertilizers and pesticides (Slaght & Pallant, 2006).In addition, through funding most companies ensures that results are favorable to them. There has been damning evidence mostly in pharmaceuticals and biotechnology sectors. For example, it has been established that funders mostly choose scientists that are